English | 繁體中文

Overview | Ideal Projects | Iterative 4D Model | 2 Uniqueness | 4-Day Agenda

If you are facing the challenge, “How can business leaders innovate faster while minimizing risks and truly meeting user needs?” — this article is exactly what you need!

Part 1: Driving Rapid Innovation

The Design Sprint method is widely regarded as one of the most effective innovation execution models within the Design Thinking method. Typically, the methodology completes an entire innovation cycle in as short as four days. Despite its condensed timeline, the Design Sprint method excels at facilitating the testing and validation of new solutions, ensuring success across three critical dimensions: Desirability, Feasibility, and Viability. By integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the Design Sprint process, the framework significantly enhances the efficiency of user needs identification, improving these processes by up to 94%.

Part 2: Six Ideal Project Types for Design Sprint

The Design Sprint projects deliver actionable results within 4 days to 4 weeks (one day per week), minimizing wasted effort and resources. Perfect for tackling user pain points, enhancing products, or optimizing processes, it enables rapid validation and confident decision-making. Below are six project types where Design Sprints excel, with real-world examples.

  1. Product Development of Light Industries: Designing a mobile app for a fitness tracking device for health-conscious youth seeking affordable solutions.
  2. Digital Product and Services: Developing a chatbot to enhance customer support for e-commerce shoppers and tech-savvy users demanding quick, personalized responses.
  3. Customer Experience Improvement: Redesigning the booking flow for a travel website to improve conversion rates for families and professionals seeking a seamless experience.
  4. Market Expansion Initiatives: Localizing an e-learning platform for students and professionals in emerging markets seeking affordable and culturally relevant education.
  5. Process Optimization: Streamlining the onboarding process with a digital workflow tool for HR teams and new hires in medium-to-large organizations.
  6. Feature Enhancement of any product and service: Adding a voice-command feature to a smart home device for tech-savvy users seeking hands-free convenience and improved accessibility.

Part 3: Iterative Double Diamond (4D) Model

There are two major types of design thinking projects, each with a distinct focus.

The first is the Design Discovery project, which prioritizes the Discover stage to uncover users’ unmet, hidden, and potential needs. This approach invests significant effort in deeply understanding and defining the problem space, leading to the creation of a single primary prototype for initial validation and refinement based on user insights. In such projects, over 75% of the time is concentrated on the first three stages—Discover, Define, and Develop—before progressing to the Deliver stage.

In contrast, the Iterative Double Diamond Model for Design Sprint emphasizes Deliver, targeting the development of workable prototypes and tangible outcomes. This iterative method dedicates around 75% of the time to the Deliver stage, where solutions are continuously refined and validated to ensure alignment with user needs, technical feasibility, and business objectives. This distinction illustrates the Double Diamond Model’s adaptability in effectively addressing various design challenges.

Part 4: Two Unique Advantages of the Iterative Double Diamond Model

In addition to its iterative approach, the Double Diamond Model provides two transformative advantages for design sprint projects. First, it facilitates a profound, evidence-based understanding of users and their pain points, surpassing the superficial insights often generated by traditional methods. Second, it employs progressive convergence strategies that strategically refine ideas and prototypes, ensuring efficient resource allocation, a sharper focus on user needs, and accelerated progress through the innovation cycle, ultimately reducing risks and maximizing impact.

(1) Enabling a deeper and more accurate understanding of users

The Iterative Double Diamond Model addresses the limitations of traditional design sprints by prioritizing a deeper understanding of user pain points in the Discover and Define stages (the first diamond). Traditional design sprints often assume that the innovation team already has a comprehensive understanding of user needs and preferences. However, this assumption can lead to flawed problem definitions, which only become apparent during the first testing phase. This misalignment has the potential to waste time, effort, and resources on solutions that fail to address real user problems. The traditional approach lacks a systematic way to validate assumptions early, leaving teams vulnerable to costly mistakes and misdirected efforts.

By leveraging advanced AI tools like social listening and sentiment analysis, Design Research in the first diamond achieves over 90% accuracy in recognizing targeted user sentiment from social media data. These tools deliver actionable insights, validate assumptions, and refine problem definitions—all within one day. As a result, solutions developed in the subsequent stages are more aligned with real user needs, minimizing the risk of misalignment and accelerating the innovation process.

(2) Systematic Refinement Through Progressive Prototyping


In the Deliver stage (the second diamond), the Iterative Double Diamond Model uses progressive convergence strategies to structure the prototyping process into three sub-stages: Functional, Interactional, and Call-to-Commitment Prototyping—aligned with the dimensions of Desirability, Feasibility, and Viability. AI tools enhance each stage for speed and insight.

  • Functional Prototyping (Desirability): Tests workflows and usability using low-fidelity prototypes (e.g., sketches, storyboards, wireframes). Validates core ideas and eliminates early flaws. AI tools like GPT analyze feedback, and DALL-E generates visuals. [Details]
  • Interactional Prototyping (Feasibility): Refines usability via medium- to high-fidelity prototypes that simulate interactions and functionality. AI tools like Stormz aid ideation, and Sentiment Analysis detects user emotions. [Details]
  • Call-to-Action Prototyping (Viability): Tests high-fidelity product and marketing prototypes for user commitment (e.g., purchases, referrals). AI tools like Social Listening track sentiment, and AICG generates marketing assets. [Details]

This structured progression ensures that prototypes evolve systematically, becoming increasingly focused and actionable as teams converge on the most viable and user-centered solutions. By addressing Desirability, Feasibility, and Viability step by step, this approach minimizes risks, enhances focus, and ensures that the final solution is not only user-friendly and technically sound but also viable in the market.

Part 5: Four-Day AI-Powered Design Sprint Agenda

The 4-Day AI-Powered Design Sprint Agenda is a fast-paced, structured process that enables innovation teams to quickly move from understanding user needs to producing over 50 prototypes ready for testing with users and key stakeholders. Divided into four stages—Discover, Define, Develop, and Deliver—this 4D process ensures maximum innovation within a condensed timeframe. From refining challenge statements and uncovering actionable insights to conducting multiple rounds of user testing, the agenda focuses on creating solutions that are user-centered, practical, and market-ready.

In addition, we implement AI tools to empower innovation teams to innovate smarter and faster, from identifying user pain points to delivering actionable prototypes.

Stage 1: Discover (Duration: 0.5 Day)

  • Scope of Work:
    • Identify Key Challenges: Use GPT to draft actionable challenge statements aligned with user needs and business goals.
    • Conduct User Research: Leverage Sentiment Analysis and Social Listening tools to uncover user pain points and behaviors from interviews and observations.
    • Analyze Findings from Empathy Interviews and Observations: Use GPT to summarize insights from empathy interviews and observations to identify opportunities.

Stage 2: Define (Duration: 0.25 Day)

  • Scope of Work:
    • Synthesize User Insights: Organize findings into Persona Maps or Customer Journey Maps using Miro and summarize insights using GPT.
    • Craft Problem Statements: Create precise problem statements with GPT based on user pain points and opportunities.
    • Prioritize Focus Areas: Use Stormz or Miro for prioritization techniques to identify key areas for design and innovation.

Stage 3: Develop (Duration: 0.25 Day)

  • Scope of Work:
    • Generate Ideas: Use GPT to brainstorm innovative solutions and Stormz for collaborative idea generation and clustering.
    • Prioritize Ideas: Leverage Sentiment Analysis to evaluate user preferences and Stormz or Miro to rank ideas based on impact and feasibility.
    • Visualize Ideas: Use DALL-E to create visual representations of selected concepts and Miro to organize and present them effectively.

Stage 4: Deliver (Duration: 3 Day)

  • Scope of Work:
    • Building Prototypes: Create progressively refined prototypes: Functional (Day 2), Interactional (Day 3), and Call-To-Action prototypes (Day 4).
    • User Testing and Feedback: Conduct user testing after each prototype iteration to gather actionable insights for refinement.
    • Refining and Finalizing Solutions: Incorporate feedback to finalize a user-centered, feasible, and business-viable solution.

About the Author: Mr. David Chung

Mr. David Chung is the founder of InnoEdge Consulting, the Dean of DesignThinkers Academy China, and the Chairman of the Hong Kong Innovation Management Institute. He is also an internationally renowned author, having published three first-ever articles exploring the application of Design Thinking and Design Sprint in Hong Kong’s aviation, hospitality, and financial industries, providing innovative insights into the field.

He has also written five professional articles focusing on the practical application of Design Thinking and Design Sprint in the aviation, banking, community development, insurance and transportation sectors in the Hong Kong Design Thinking Casebook 2019-2022.

With over 20 years of experience, Mr. Chung has led more than 100 digital transformation and innovation projects across Asia and led over 550 training classes in Innovation Management. He holds internationally recognized qualifications, including Certified Design Thinking Facilitator, Certified Chief Innovation Officer, and Certified Sustainable Development Planner and is a Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) candidate.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR