English | Chinese (繁體中文)
The Role of This Tool in the Second Phase of the Design Thinking Method

System Immersion (Stakeholder / Ecosystem Immersion) exposes you to the full ecosystem of stakeholders around the user—frontline staff, back‑office teams, partners, IT, compliance, and management—to understand how policies, processes, incentives, and constraints shape the user experience. In Discover, it reveals root causes of problems that lie in organisational structures, handovers, or conflicting KPIs, not just the interface or front‑stage service. This leads to problem definitions that address the whole system, not only the visible symptoms.
System Immersion is most suitable for complex, multi‑stakeholder services, such as healthcare systems, financial institutions, universities, logistics and supply chains, public services, and large enterprise platforms. It is critical when user problems appear to stem from delays, inconsistent information, handoff errors, policy rigidity, or siloed processes, and when any solution will require coordination across departments or organisations.
Access to all relevant stakeholders can be difficult; some roles may be reluctant to participate or constrained by confidentiality, leading to gaps in your view of the system. People may present an idealised version of processes or emphasise others’ failings instead of systemic issues. There is also a risk of getting lost in complexity, gathering lots of process detail without clear focus, and of drifting away from the user’s perspective if you over‑identify with organisational constraints.
The Procedure for Using This Design Thinking Tool
Step (1) Map the high‑level ecosystem: Identify all key stakeholder groups (users, frontline, back‑office, partners, regulators, IT, management) and their roles.
Step (2) Prioritise critical stakeholders: Decide which roles most strongly influence the user’s experience or the problem you’re investigating.
Step (3) Arrange access and interviews: Secure meetings, ride‑alongs, or shadowing opportunities with representatives from each critical stakeholder group.
Step (4) Create stakeholder‑specific guides: Prepare tailored questions for each role (goals, pain points, constraints, incentives, handovers, typical conflicts).
Step (5) Observe and/or shadow stakeholders at work: Where possible, see them performing real tasks, not just describing them.
Step (6) Document processes and handovers: Map how information, decisions, and work items move between roles; note waiting times, rework, and failure points.
Step (7) Identify misalignments and tensions: Capture conflicting goals, metrics, or policies that create friction for users or staff.
Step (8) Cross‑check perspectives: Compare how different stakeholders describe the same process or issue to reveal disconnects and blind spots.
Step (9) Create a system map or service blueprint: Visualise actors, processes, touchpoints, and pain points across front stage and back stage.
Step (10) Derive system‑level problem statements: Formulate problems that integrate user and system views (e.g., “How might we reduce handoff failures between X and Y while respecting Z constraints?”).
Important Note:
In practice, “immersion” is not a single, isolated research method, but a mindset and set of practices for entering the user’s world as fully as possible. In a real user‑research project, you will usually combine multiple types of immersion. For example, you might start with Cognitive Immersion to observe how users process information and make decisions, then add Emotional Immersion to evoke their anxiety, frustration, or hope in key moments.
You may also use Spatial and Sensory Immersion in the real environment to see how space, noise, light, and other sensory factors shape behaviour, while Behavioral, System, and Ethnographic Immersion help you grasp everyday routines, organisational processes, and cultural context. By combining multiple immersion methods, you gain a more complete picture of the persona’s pain points, needs, expectations, and constraints in real life and across the wider system, and you avoid making design decisions based on a single, partial perspective.
Next Steps in Your Design Thinking Journey
Continue your innovation journey with the following 3 Options to deepen your Design Thinking practice and amplify your impact.
![[ InnoEdge Case] HK$3 Billion in Sustained Growth: How a Design Sprint Led to a Breakthrough in Customer Retention for a Bank in Hong Kong](https://i0.wp.com/www.innoedge.com.hk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/card-3.jpg?resize=218%2C150&ssl=1)
![[InnoEdge Case] Innovation Jam 2024: Co-creative Community Design Journey for Sham Shui Po Fabric Market (深水埗新布藝市場)with 2-Day AI-Driven Design Sprint](https://i0.wp.com/www.innoedge.com.hk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/WhatsApp-%E5%9C%96%E7%89%872024-12-1521.04.44_f91d8d49-scaled.jpg?resize=218%2C150&ssl=1)



![[視頻 及 專題文章] 應用 AI 設計思維方法,推動 香港構建快樂企業](https://i0.wp.com/www.innoedge.com.hk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/20250320182853indexPhoto.jpg?resize=218%2C150&ssl=1)





![[現正接受報名] AI Rehabilitation Hackathon HK 2026 (如何提升病人復康效果,從而增加香港競爭力?)](https://i0.wp.com/www.innoedge.com.hk/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Cover-Picture.jpg?resize=218%2C150&ssl=1)








